Tag Archives: negligence

Other driver

You may be driving below the speed limit and obeying the traffic signals. Another driver ploughs into your car. In each instance, it does not necessarily mean that the other driver’s insurance company should pay your medical and car repair bills.

The small details of the accident matter. Rules vary from one state to another.   There must be proof of negligence for the other driver to be liable.

Attorney Benjamin Zimmerman, a partner with Sugarman & Sugarman, a firm of attorneys in Boston, claims that if negligence cannot be proved, then you cannot win the case and if you cannot win the case, insurance companies know that and therefore will not pay.

An important aspect to a successful claim is to prove the other driver is at fault as quickly and as thoroughly.

In states with no-fault auto insurance systems, your own insurance generally pays for your medical bills. This is regardless of who was at fault.

In some states, such as New Jersey it is illegal to operate a motor vehicle that does not have liability insurance coverage. In some jurisdictions. liability coverage is available either as a combined single limit policy, or as a split limit policy. Virginia does not require that the other driver carry car insurance.

There are instances when the other driver’s insurance company may refuse to pay out, even if you think it should pay out.

A sudden incapacitating medical event is a defense and is more common than people might think. The other driver may have a heart attack or stroke. If he did not have enough warning of this, the person may not be liable if he loses control of the vehicle. On the other hand, if this person was aware of his medical condition, he should not have been driving a car is is therefore liable.

Another example is that of a pregnant woman who hit a car. The attorney representing his client managed to establish that the pregnant woman had enough time to pull to the side of the road safely. This could have happened  before she was feeling flushed and fainted. Her insurance company then had to pay his client’s claim.

A collision from a fire truck racing to an emergency: The standard for proving that an emergency vehicle driver was liable is much higher than the standard for other drivers. Local and state jurisdictions have varying rules and timelines for filing claims against them.

Many lawyers do not want to take on these types of cases as there is a tremendous amount of red tape involved.  Most emergency vehicles enjoy immunity from liability for negligence.

If  the other driver hits you because of an accident with a hit and run driver, depending on the state, you may be able to claim under your own uninsured motorist coverage. Should you be hit by the other driver who fails to stop, this is regarded as a criminal offense in all states in the USA. The police are supposed to provide immediate assistance.

In most instances, a vehicle insurance policy covers you and other licensed drivers in the household who are listed on the policy and any person that you give occasional permission to drive the vehicle.

However, when a thief takes a car, there is no permission or consent. Therefore, the car owner’s insurance will not pay. If the thief was caught and he had a policy, his insurer would also not pay because insurance does not apply to criminal acts. You could sue the thief, but the chances of recovering any money damages are minimal. In some states, the car owner may be found partially liable if he did something negligent, which led to the theft, for example, he left the keys in the car whilst the engine was on.

There are instances when an accident occurs which is nobody’s fault. A deer may jump out in front of a vehicle causing it to hit someone else. A driver could be partially liable if he was exceeding the speed limit.

Certain states have comparative negligence laws when liability is calculated on a percentage basis. One party may be 30 per cent liable and the other party 70 per cent liable.

Comparative negligence laws dictate how the responsibility for an accident will be shared between the parties directly involved in an accident, where bodily injury or property damage was suffered.

The insurance company will make the injured party an offer based on what it believes to be the amount of negligence of its insured. The insurance company may interview the involved parties, including witnesses, and may also review the accident report in order to determine the amount of the offer.

An insurance company may believe that its insured was not more than 50% or more at fault.  They may not offer to pay any damages for the loss. The other driver may negotiate with the insurance company until a settlement is reached or until the two parties reach an impasse.

If a settlement cannot be reached, the courts make the final determination of comparative negligence.

Casualty Insurance Part 1 of 2

The lines of coverage addressed by casualty insurance are:

Automotive liability
general liability
products liability
umbrella liability
excess liability
workers’ compensation
professional liability (medical malpractice)
environmental products liability

Casualty Insurance is often equated to liability insurance of an individual or organisation for negligent acts or omissions.

The term has also been used for property insurance as well as aviation insurance.  Boiler,  machinery,  insurance, glass and crime insurance falls under this category.  It can include marine insurance for shipwrecks or losses at sea.  Also included may be earthquake, political risk insurance, terrorism insurance, fidelity and surety bonds.

One of the most common kinds of casualty insurance today is automobile insurance. In its most basic form, automobile insurance provides liability coverage in the event that a driver is found “at fault” in an accident. This can cover medical expenses of individuals involved in the accident.  Furthermore it can be for  restitution or repair of damaged property.

GENERAL LIABILITY (Under Casualty Insurance)

The number of lawsuits being filed against businesses is both surprising and alarming. General liability is the first line of defense. A business can be sued for almost any reason. Negligence, personal injury, libel, slander, errors, omissions, faulty products, advertising misprints and more.

It can cover things like bodily injury, property damage, contractual liability, damages to property you rent or occupy.  Data Breach is offered as an optional coverage that can help you comply with regulatory requirements.  It can provide guidance on how to prevent and handle a breach.  This can also cover response and liability expenses to quickly restore confidence in your practice or business.

PRODUCT LIABILITY (Under Casualty Insurance)

This is the area of law in which manufacturers, distributors, suppliers, retailers and others who make products available to the public are held responsible for the injuries those products cause.

In the United States, the claims most commonly associated with product liability are negligence, strict liability, breach of warranty and various consumer protection claims. The majority of product liability laws are determined at the state level and vary widely from state to state. Each type of product liability claim requires different elements to be proven to present a successful claim.

There are three major types of product liability claims:
Manufacturing defect
Design defect
A failure to warn (also known as marketing defects)

However, in most states these are not legal claims in and of themselves, but are pleaded in terms of the theories mentioned above. For example, a plaintiff might plead negligent failure to warn or strict liability for defective design.
Manufacturing defects are also those that occur in the manufacturing process and usually involve poor quality materials or shoddy workmanship.

Design defects occur where the product design is inherently dangerous or useless no matter how carefully manufactured.

Failure- to- warn defects arise in products that carry inherent non-obvious dangers which could be mitigated through adequate warnings to the user, and these dangers are present regardless of how well the product is manufactured and designed for its intended purpose.

However, in most states these are not legal claims in and of themselves, but are pleaded in terms of the theories mentioned above. For example, a plaintiff might plead negligent failure to warn of liability for defective design. Manufacturing defect are those that occur in the manufacturing process and usually involve poor quality materials or shoddy workmanship. Design defects occur where the product design is inherently dangerous or useless no matter how carefully manufactured.

A basic negligence claim consists of:-

a duty owed
a breach of that duty
the breach was the cause in fact of the plaintiff’s injury (actual cause)
the breach proximately caused the plaintiff’s injury
and the plaintiff suffered actual quantifiable injury (damages)

Rather than focus on the behaviour of the manufacturer (as in negligence), strict liability claims focus on the product itself. Under strict liability, the manufacturer is liable if the product is defective, even if the manufacturer was not negligent in making that product defective.

UMBRELLA INSURANCE (Under Casualty Insurance)

Umbrella insurance refers to liability insurance that is in excess of specified other policies and also potentially primary insurance for losses not covered by the other policies.

Excess insurance is similar in that it pays after an underlying primary policy is exhausted. Umbrella policies tend to provide broader coverage over one or more primary policies. An umbrella policy may cover certain risks from the first dollar of loss or liability incurred, which were never covered under the primary policies. As your wealth increases, so does your attractiveness as a target for lawsuits.  Examples of liability that an umbrella policy may cover that a homeowner’s policy often excludes include:
False arrest
Libel
Slander
Invasion of privacy

Liability settlements and verdicts can exceed $10 million, $20 million and higher. While trusts and other techniques can shield some assets from the court’s reach, prudence suggests choosing coverage at least equal to your current net worth and present value of your employment income stream.

It is also worth considering the moral obligation to be able to fully compensate someone who has perhaps suffered a lifelong debilitating injury for which you are responsible e. g. in a car accident where the driver was at fault.
Umbrella coverage typically costs a few hundred dollars in premium per million dollars of coverage and furthermore the cost per million decreases as the amount of coverage increases.